![]() |
|
| Home Articles Worldwake Spoiler (145/145) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Writing/Contests Chat About | |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#46 |
|
Wizard Mentor
|
I think sprout is better used as a surprise blocker blocking attacking x/1's.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Experienced Mage
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
other than that this is pretty much me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Ascended Mage
|
Really? Ivory Giant at 1? No Blink?
I have Looter higher and Drakeling Top 5. I have Snapback way lower. Tendrils at 2 for me. I like Empty the Warrens high. It can be really strong and isn't hard to draft with so many options. Yeah, I have Baloth at 1 and Sliver over Search. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Random Scrub
MTGS Writer Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 8,212
![]() |
Ivory Giant is great only in mono-White decks, which are very hard to draft at most tables. On top of that it goes late (because most other decks don't much value it). So no, I don't think it belongs on top of any list.
Also, I'd prefer Temporal Isolation to a Giant even for a mono-White deck and even independent of the scarcity of each at the table. Amrou Scout is similarly hard to rate, because it's vital in the Rebel deck, but again that's hard to draft and the card's otherwise not that great.
__________________
-- Forum Awards: Best Writer 2005, Best Limited Strategist 2005-2009 5CB PotM - June 2005, November 2005, February 2006, April 2008, May 2008, Feb 2009 MTGSalvation Articles: 1-20, plus guest appearance on MTGCast #86! <Limited Clan> |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,449
|
Quote:
Ivory Giant could have very well been a mistake at 1, but he's easily the most important card for the white deck, and while i agree with baleteur that you can normally wheel them if you know hte table, i still think he deserves a high spot. Blink could be subbed in for amrou seekers at 5, and it could maybe be a little higher. Its just hard as white's commons are so deep, some just can't make the top 5. Looter is a low as he is only because he has one toughness and doesn't fly. I have an extreme distaste for creatures of that variety in this format. And snapback could very well be higher, tempo is unbelievable important in this format. I'm sure I have black wrong past strangling soot. My only experience with black is UB madness, hense the tresspasser being as high as it is. I have Empty the Warrens as the top non-removal red spell in the format, it can't justifiably get higher than that. Baloth doesn't make top 5 for me because, in practice, it's too slow. "How can this be?" you ask? Simple, so many games my opponent has suspended a baloth on turn one (I remember once where my opponent suspended baloths on turns 1-3) and was either dead or so close that they simply didn't matter, or my ivory giants started goming into play and they were irrelevant. And even if i were to put baloth in my top five, I absolutely wont put it over spider. --- I probably should have said this in my first post. But alot of my rankings have to do with the cards' relevaance either in or against the "white deck," which is in my opinion the strongest deck in the format.
__________________
![]() Last edited by moogie : 12-01-2006 at 03:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 441
![]() |
Still wondering what's the deal with Trespasser and Syphon-Mage. In my black decks those have performed rather mediocre, so far. So you can flash a Gorgon into play via Syphon-Mage for just 2BBB instead of 3BB? Great deal. As a madness enabler at least the Mage is sub-par, while Trespasser at least also doesn't generate card advantage (which Looter il-Kor; Tolarian Sentinel and other cards do combined with Madness).
Incidentally, I think this is exactly where most people get that impression that black should be avoided under all circumstances. Their card evaluations are simply off (although I don't understand why these misevaluations are still lingering since performance of good cards should of course be better than that of average ones, for everyone to see). The key to drafting black isn't to obstinately going the aggro route because everyone does, or to draft low-quality madness enablers over cards that are good on their own just so you can cast your Dark Banishing before you die. The key is - as with any other color in any limited format - to draft the good cards first, ever. Also many people have pointed out that black is sloooooow in TS-Limited. Which is true. But I can't understand that so many don't draw the right consequences by putting Feebleness (most desireable black common-2-Drop) into the black Top 5 which can deal very well with an opponent's tempo draw. I just don't get it, but I think many of you can still learn a lot about how to successfully draft black by observing the Japanese TS-Limited strategy. All right, this might explain a little bit. But still, with UB Madness your other options (Looter, Sentinel, Considerations) are superior to Trespasser, and espescially in this combination I'd take the madness cards first, since every time you're paying a madness cost off a blue enabler you generate card advantage.
__________________
"A key part of design is not making the cards do the most but rather making cards that get the most out of the player. Almost every sorcery could be an instant. Most cards could have another ability. The average creature could get +1 toughness. What makes a game fun is not the power of the cards, but the power of the experience. Working for a victory is a far greater pleasure than having one handed to you." - Mark Rosewater, January 23, 2006 Last edited by Sheera : 12-01-2006 at 03:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
has a cunning plan™
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perfide Albion
Posts: 5,311
![]() |
I think you have a good point about too much focus on madness but Considerations is not a madness outlet to me. Trespasser is quite good in this respect and as an evasive 3/1 for 3, it's still nice. Problem is : it fits more in an aggro strategy and black can't really play aggro in TS.
Point is : I don't think much of madness and black both lacks depths and has high colour requirements. It can work if it's underdrafted but cannot support 3 "more-than-splash" players on the table. My top five in black is not fixed at all, apart from Soot. It changes depending on how open black is but the following are what I hope to end up with in decent quantity if I go black (to be decided on P1P4 to P1P8) : 1. Soot 2. Feebleness 3. Corpulent Corpse 4. Mindstab 5. Urborg Syphon-Mage The 3 to 5 I'd want in about equal proportions. With 6 Swamps or less as a target, I would probably neglect Tendrils of Corruption. If I'm heavy black (8 Swamps or more), then Tendrils jumps to 2nd.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Puzzle : 12-01-2006 at 04:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Anyway, I would drop Corpulent Corpse off of that list and replace it with Trespasser il-Vec. It's basically always unblockable and is also the best black madness outlet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Wizard Mentor
|
I had a fnm draft and I drafted Gaze of Justice pretty high (since its removal). But I was never able to cast it. Lol had to learn that the hard way
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 422
![]() |
Temporal Isolation - I need to learn to read. Had this on my Plague sliver last night, and I thought I was "losing life" from the Sliver. Fortify - underrated, IMHO Errant Ephemeron Looter il-Kor Strangling Soot - hands down, get in there one random mountain. ![]() Lightning Axe Rift Bolt Grapeshot ![]() Nantuko Shaman - annoying when a land gets Trickster-ed Penumbra Spider Terramorphic Expanse |
|
|
|