![]() |
| Home Articles Modern Masters Spoiler (29/229) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Chat About Register Now! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 | |
|
Archmage
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California
Posts: 834
![]() |
Quote:
If it's that much of a problem, then modify your deck and/or sideboard accordingly. Run more creatures that are still conducive to your game plan, and pray they don't draw any of their Hornet Stings or Apostle's Blessings if they choose to side them in. If it still doesn't work out, then I don't know what to say. Maybe you should try a different deck for a while.
__________________
Quoted for Truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 441
![]() |
Really you haven't? I play pauper infect because it's an amazing deck for doublequeing. Yeah sometimes you get the turn 2 kill hands and many other times you don't. I'd say the turn 2 kill rate is maybe 20%. But you can definittly power through even some of the best removal spells. But you definitely need to know when to just hold on playing the 1st donk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,021
|
@OP:
Doom Blade is common. Go for the Throat is common. Terror is common. Gut Shot is common. (A well-timed one can really screw your opponent over.) Pacifism is, surprise surprise, common. Guard Duty is common. Why do I bring this up? Because infect isn't that bad in Pauper. I mean, most Pauper decks end up being aggro anyway. And your opponent has to get one in his first seven cards to hurt you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Archmage
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 897
![]() |
Guard Duty is horrible in general, because Kirtar's Desire is a card in the game of Magic.
__________________
Like Pauper? Like saying "no?" Read the ![]() 8-Post Primer!The cycle of MTGSalvation: "Wizards hates combo!" "Wizards hates control!" "Wizards hates Aggro!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Ultimate Ascended Mage
![]() |
off the top of my head here are some really ridiculously easy answers to infect.
Spoiler:
The complaining in this thread is so utterly ridiculous. everyone remembers their infuriating turn 2 losses but doesn't remember any games that play out normally? how about a quick calculation of the chance of having a glistener elf in a persons opening hand, which is the card you absolutely have to have to have a turn 2 kill: 49.183%. now take the chances that you have enough pump to kill on turn two. I'm not going to bother since finding the exact amount since it varies between lists but lets say its around 50%. thats extremely high (its probably closer to 30%) since in most cases you need combinations of 3 and atleast one needs to be free but for arguments sack lets pick a high number. so now you're down to about 25%. now factor in lands. Then haveing the right about of lands to cast your spells but also still having enough pump. the add into that the fact that if your opponent runs out a one drop then you need to have another of a specific pump spell to get through that. then factor in the possibly that your opponent actually has relevant removal (*gasp*)... the percentage of turn 2 kills is so tiny. Likely around the same as storm. If you feel still feel so frustrated about infect after realizing they don't have as many turn 2 kills as you think, there are a few options: 1) change your deck. most people realize that when you're constantly losing to a deck, you should probably add answers to it. thats what happens when something dominates a meta or you just constantly lose to it and feel like its dominating. 2)play a different format. there are plenty of other formats and in pretty much all of them, infect barely exists as a deck. -- Also unrelated to the infect problem, but in that 3rd post, why exactly was terramorphic expanse in a burn deck?
__________________
Trade Thread here ![]() Currently Taking altered art Comissions. www.nf96alters.webs.com Quick and Cheap Alters (looking to fill up some slots so some special pricing currently) Ebay Stuff Last edited by Numotflame96; 05-05-2012 at 08:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lancaster, UK
Posts: 1,217
![]() |
I know this from experience- I've made the same mistake during a pauper event.
Ended up losing 2-1 with Kiln Fiend and coming second to that deck; it's very strong but certainly not unbeatable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Back from Exile
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,990
|
I think storm combo is a more degenerate deck than Infect. You can actually throw out a blocker and slow down infect, even for a turn and cause them to waste a pump spell.
With storm, you need a way to stop 10+ tokens, and oftentimes at instant speed due to bushwhacker killing you that turn. It's the most uninteractive deck in the format. Get rid of Empty the Warrens, and it will be easier to hate out the other decks without auto-losing to storm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
stay in school
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 3,933
![]() |
It's a combo deck, and there are plenty of answers for it. Just because your deck has a bad matchup or you come unprepared to deal with it doesn't mean that the deck is too degenerate, or even a tier 1 deck in the format.
__________________
A Think Twice in hand is worth two in the grave. You can find me on MTGO. My username is gereffi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Back from Exile
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,990
|
Quote:
I suppose it isn't nearly as bad as storm combo is legacy or even modern though, and it isn't as bad as when familiar storm was floating around. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Experienced Mage
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
![]() |
The most fun card to play against empty the warrens is suture priest xD
__________________
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. John Adams Magic Intelligence - Now in the last stage of beta. With archetyps and pretty more data! A strong source for facts.. or as you can say statistics and decklists of MtG! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|