![]() |
| Home Articles Modern Masters Spoiler (4/229) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Chat About Register Now! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Resident Planeswalker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Cube Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 27,429
![]() |
Assuming you're playing a format where every card in the cube is being used (which is rare here) and that there's 3 decks at the table that don't want any equipment at all. Those are both pretty unreliable estimations for my cube.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Resident Planeswalker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,249
|
It actually doesn't matter how many people are playing, the percentage stays the same. Assuming a 45 card pool per player, there are 1.25 pieces of equipment per player in your cube. Getting a hold of two for a white equipment deck really shouldn't be that difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Do not read this
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Covington, GA
Posts: 6,454
![]() |
Quote:
EDIT: I do agree this card loses value in 2 man formats, everyone wants to play equipment in those formats so the competition for it is fierce.
__________________
EDH - Rhys the Redeemed - Kiku, Night's Flower - Uril, the Miststalker - Wydwen, the Biting Gale - Angus Mackenzie - Kaervek the Merciless - Thada Adel, Acquisitor - Dosan the Falling Leaf - Edric, Spymaster of Trest - Vorosh, the Hunter - 540+ Card Unpowered Cube Last edited by Donald; 05-04-2012 at 11:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Cube Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 27,429
![]() |
Quote:
And that doesn't factor in Winston or Sealed either, which makes the results even more random. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 298
|
I was watching the replays of various finals in MTGO cube matches yesterday (a fascinating endeavor), and what I saw was that basically no white decks won without playing either Armageddon or a busted equipment (esp. jitte/sword of X+Y).
Based on this, there's nothing I want more in my white decks than the ability to do those two things regularly. I think that the cards are just that powerful (and yes, I'd likely try to splash blue for mystical tutor so I could reliably cast Geddon). Were I unable to pick up Stoneforge, I would happily run this card in any white-based deck so long as I had one of the 6 most busted equipment (5 swords, jitte), and w/ Skullclamp and Batterskull in certain decks as well. If I had Stoneforge in my deck, I would probably not run Gift at all. I don't think this is a 360 card, because there are relatively few people that want Stoneforge (2 or 3, probably). But I don't think you need to get much larger to want to run it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Cube Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 27,429
![]() |
Basing changes to an average cube on results from the MTGO cube isn't wise advice, IMO. White is far from underpowered in the average cube list, and cutting any of the great white cards in most cubes for this card wouldn't increase it's average performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 581
|
I think the Steelshaper's is a fine card, especially if you run a very robust equipment suite. I think it's probably better than Enlightened Tutor in cube. You should give it a shot, Naill, and let us know how it works out. Bear in mind that just a few months ago on this forum, there was talk of Stoneforge Mystic being worse than the Soltari brothers.
__________________
Three Sixty Winstoncentric Unpowered |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Know. Think. Choose. Do.
|
Quote:
That makes it fairly narrow, as in the cube, the bomb equipment is pretty much all top-pick material, and it is hard to draft a multi-sword deck consistently enough to merit drafting SS's Gift early. I do think it goes great in larger cubes where there is room for more P1P1 equipment.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 581
|
Of course nobody will pick it in the first few picks, but there's nothing wrong with including a card that will get picked late and fits into a specific type of deck (e.g. most gold cards). It may go 15th much of the time, or be passed in a Winston 80% of the time, but once picked up it'll probably have a big impact on the game much more often than its pick order would indicate.
__________________
Three Sixty Winstoncentric Unpowered |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Cube Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 27,429
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 581
|
Quote:
Pernicious Deed Wurmcoil Engine Recurring Nightmare Treachery Winter Orb Coalition Relic (maybe) Tangle Wire(if you can get it out in time) Crucible of Worlds (if you have Strip Mine) Oblivion Ring (if they're about to PW ultimate) I'll concede that being able to tutor at instant speed is nice for denying your opponent the chance to respond, but I'm guessing that at least half the time I'd be happier with Steelshaper's Gift than an Enlightened Tutor. Maybe in your own personal evaluation style, since you seem to value flexibility/consistency much higher than potential power, 50% of the time is not enough to make Steelshifter's Gift worth including alongside or in place of the Tutor. But personal preference aside, I strongly disagree that the Tutor is leagues above Steelshaper's Gift.
__________________
Three Sixty Winstoncentric Unpowered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,023
![]() |
Even if it fetches a low-priority target, E. Tutor will always grab something. Steelshaper's Gift trades that ability for a narrower choice and the potential to be a dead card. And it's worth the card-disadvantage if the tutor fetches exactly the card you need to save you in a sticky situation, since the alternative would be losing the game. It's worth noting that the Gift has the same problem of card and tempo disadvantage as the tutor. If you're not using it to grab a sword or a jitte, then the disadvantage hardly seems worth it.
Enlightened Tutor is an answer. Steelshaper's Gift wants to be a threat. Given a choice between a Gift or a second equipment in draft, I'd rather pick the equipment. At least I know it's guaranteed not to be a dead card (or card disadvantage, whichever) if I draw the other first.
__________________
My Cube: 720 cards powered (MTGSalvation) My Cube (DeckStats) My Pauper Cube: 540 Level 1 Judge |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 624
![]() |
I have to disagree here. If I have a Jitte, SoBaM or SoFI in my pile I'd rather pick up a Gift than a Basilisk Collar. And if it's later in pack one, or in pack 2, it's not even close.
__________________
Leave a comment about my Cube!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Know. Think. Choose. Do.
|
Quote:
Granted, the situation where you tutor for Mox Emerald is pretty narrow, but the flexibility to tutor up exactly what you need to win the game is pretty enormous, and it also includes the ability to do everything that SS's gift does, minus it costing you a card. Costing a card is worth it when I can get Sulfuric Vortex or Wurmcoil Engine on demand. Being an instant also allows you to choose at the end of your opponent's turn acting on more information than SS's Gift lets you and providing them no chance to react, rather than giving them an entire turn to figure out how to answer the equipment you just showed them. And this is cube, so you can bet that every card you can tutor is a good card in the right situation.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|