![]() |
|
| Home Articles Zendikar Spoiler (249/249) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Writing/Contests Chat About | |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Oversoul of Rumors
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 224
|
Burrenton Bombardier 2W
Kithkin Soldier C Flying Reinforce 2-2W 2/2 Ron Spencer 3/150 Ballyrush Banneret 1W Kithkin Soldier Kithkin spells and Soldier spells you play cost 1 less to play. 2/1 Ralph Horsley 1 /150 Daily Regimen - W Enchantment - Aura (U) Enchant creature 1W - Put a +1/+1 counter on enchanted creature 8/150 Confirmation from other threads. CrimsonMage good catch thank you
__________________
Retired
Last edited by Imps Mischeif : 01-09-2008 at 12:03 PM. Reason: opps |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Archmage Overlord
|
Wohoo useable Banneret.....
The other two are limited but the soldier is really good there as a cheap flier that can be a combat trick. It should have costed one less and it would have been constructed playable. The aura will be better than it looks with the counter elementals and all the class lords that give bonuses to creatures with counters in limited. Last edited by Nau : 01-09-2008 at 12:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Textbased Lifeform
MTGS Writer ![]() |
Sorry, but how much does The Bombarier Cost? I guess 2W or 3W.
Looks like a good limited common. 2/2 fliers are never bad and an additional Combat trick is always welcome. The Banneret isn't really surprising and White never has to few 2 mana 2 power critters. Let's see if he can make soldiers a little more playable. As always, thanks a lot for the cards.
__________________
Thanks to ChibiSwan for the Signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Experienced Mage
|
Yes i would have to agree thats its either a wrong casting cost or maybe its just a really really good uncommon...Only time will tell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 705
|
Oh boy, more white weenie junk, just what white didn't need to be competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 744
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Archmage
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 986
![]() |
Kithkin need Shadow or Flying, this way they can't kill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Archmage Overlord
|
Quote:
Now that I think about it, the red banneret got reinforce so maybe a RW elementals for casual ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Archmage Overlord
|
The aura is actually really useful if you have some of those remove a counter get an effect things. Still, there's the 2 for 1 risk that you're getting. If you have an opportune moment and an opportune creature you can offset that, but perhaps that's too much too ask usually. I do not know.
The 2/2 flier for 3 with a combat trick is great for limited and a very playable white common (for a change). The banneret is also very effectively costed for an aggro deck. Nice cards!
__________________
You'll bend to my will- with or without your precious sanity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
No, you cannot take me to prom.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Free Range
Posts: 2,343
|
That white enchantment makes me wonder whether Dragon Blood is in this set. I hope so.
I could see putting that enchantment on some pro creatures of some kind. Probably just casual deck material. Spike Feeder type of fun. That kithkin is an interesting 3 drop. Yet another creature supplanting my Aven Changelings.
__________________
![]() EDH scorecard for download: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=175899 Tome Magic experiment |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 444
|
The Aura is okay. Much better if it also granted an additional ability on pumping mana into it (say, first-strike).
The Bombardier is excellent in Limited. 2/2 fliers are almost always welcome, and if need be, it can be a combat trick. The Banneret is nice. Makes an already fast deck perhaps slightly faster. Also, aggressively costed, which is very nice indeed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Textbased Lifeform
MTGS Writer ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Thanks to ChibiSwan for the Signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
Why is the bedroom so cold?
Moderator ![]() |
Quote:
Daily Regimen - W Enchantment - Aura (U) Enchant creature Reinforce 1-1W 8/150 What is it? Is it supposed to be: Daily Regimen - W Enchantment - Aura (U) Enchant creature 1W: Put a +1/+1 counter on enchanted creature 8/150 ???
__________________
Artist in High~Light Studios Leader of the Pack Find the rest at the Crossroads
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Idealistic Lefty Pessimist
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,995
|
Quote:
And yeah, there are no dragons in Lorwyn, so Dragon Blood is definitely not in. Zaphod, it says it puts the counter on enchanted creature, not target creature. It's obviously just a typo and the hyphen should be a colon. |
|
|
|
|