|
|
#1 |
|
Oversoul of Rumors
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 224
|
Nevermaker
![]() ![]() Elemental UNC Flying When Nevermaker leaves play, put target nonland permanent on top of its owner's library Evoke ![]() ![]() 2/3 44/150
__________________
Retired
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Archmage
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 986
![]() |
What's the use of evoking a card like this?
NVM, but still, bwoah |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Immortal One
![]() |
All of these 'leaves' play triggered Evoke guys are so much worse than the initial ones. Disappointing, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playing God? Who's Playing? I'm not playin
|
I sorta kinda almost just about might consider maybe not thinking to lowly of that. It has its uses. At first I was gonna ask why is the evoke cost the same, then I realized so I could sac it and get the effect immediately, for times when a 2/3 is just not useful. I have no idea when that time would be.
__________________
![]() What would you attempt if you knew you wouldn't fail? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 444
|
This is awesome. This is just awesome in Limited. 4-mana for a 2/3 flier is playable. The leaves play ability is just icing on the cake. Although, I could definitely imagine times when I'll evoke it rather than play it (e.g. if I want to win a clash or something).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Archmage
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 986
![]() |
Aah, I get the joke, see the name? It'll never make into your deck, that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Experienced Mage
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 113
|
I'm hating those "leaves play" evokers. They're just so much worse than the initial ones.
At least if it was "comes into play or leaves play", it would've been pretty decent. This is real bad :S Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Common Mage
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Liège - Belgium
Posts: 44
![]() |
Damn, they could have made it able to target lands... O! plow under were art thou ? Or even flash...
Otherwise, still playable. As a 2/3 flying for 4 with a bonus "loose a draw and a creature for now" ... wich in limited could mean "loose a turn". Filler uncommon so... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Archmage
|
Quote:
But I doubt it ;(
__________________
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Sing, o muse, of rage unending
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 1428 Elm street, Springwood. Helping Freddy in the boiler room.
Posts: 2,612
Blog Entries: 18
![]() |
After they spoiled us with Shriekmaw and Mulldrifter, these new evokers just can't do it anymore.
__________________
![]() Banner and avatar by the one and only Craven at Epic graphics. Check them out. Offical High Priest of Reign of Blood |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
change we can imagine
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: peak everything
Posts: 8,984
![]() |
* rancored_elf slaps his knee*
Nevermake'r into your deck... hah! Anyway, assuming it's correct, I think it's limited playable and might have some constructed applications in the right deck. Neither option is very efficient, but having the option available is nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
No, you cannot take me to prom.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Free Range
Posts: 2,343
|
Quote:
I dunno. This thing will be nice and annoying in my mill deck as a blocker.
__________________
![]() EDH scorecard for download: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=175899 Tome Magic experiment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Ascended Mage
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 330
|
It could be used in a blink deck to lock things up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Immortal One
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,715
![]() |
I want to point out to everyone of this basic opinion that when evoke was brand new the speculation threads were just littered with this sort of thing. While I am disappointed by these leaves play evoke creatures, I remember a lot of enthusiasm for this idea a few months ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,165
|
Well for one thing it could be made a kicker spell easily.
Maybe kicker 0 if you pay the kicker cost the creature dies? Its not bad and def for limited.
__________________
|
|
|
|