MTG Salvation Forums
Home Articles Worldwake Spoiler (145/145) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Writing/Contests Chat About

Go Back   MTG Salvation Forums > Magic Fundamentals > The Rumor Mill
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2009, 10:24 AM   #1
Dr. Jeebus
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,658
Default [CON] Yoke of the Damned

riddle:

F
or
a few sets now, I've done complete and full set reviews. I started it to see how accurate I could be, but it's certainly not a light task. I'm discussing the new sets when I'm at work and judging all the time, and want to share the ratings with everyone.

As you may have read, in the past I have briefly discussed each card,even all the commons. This is rough both to write and read, as many cards are simply limited fodder.

Re
cently, I totaled my thoughts and compiled a review of sets on the whole. Without even having a single draft completed, it is not easy to rate themes, colours, chase rares, and such, but it was a fun challenge.

Now the que
stion I've been needing to ask: should I continue to showcase each common, uncommon, and rare, or is it time to scale back the reviews?I'm grateful for smaller set sizes as it saves time, but is there a point at all or should I cut the single card reviews and focus on the set as a whole?

Of course I have always loved the feedback I received, even from those with whom I disagreed. I intend to again challenge myself to bring all my knowledge and experience to the table before the prerelease in the hopes of being of some use to you all. The question of format for the review and suggestions of what people want to see is of course the point of this thread, however.


That and something else...

Solved!
Spoiler:

Yoke of the Damned 1b
Enchantment - Aura
Enchant creature.
Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, enchanted creature's controller sacrifices it.
Common


And here's a less painful to read version of what I wrote, as it's actually relevant without the riddle:
For a few sets now, I've done complete and full set reviews. I started it to see how accurate I could be, but it's certainly not a light task. I'm discussing the new sets when I'm at work and judging all the time, and want to share the ratings with everyone.

As you may have read, in the past I have briefly discussed each card,even all the commons. This is rough both to write and read, as many cards are simply limited fodder.

Recently, I totaled my thoughts and compiled a review of sets on the whole. Without even having a single draft completed, it is not easy to rate themes, colours, chase rares, and such, but it was a fun challenge.

Now the question I've been needing to ask: should I continue to showcase each common, uncommon, and rare, or is it time to scale back the reviews?I'm grateful for smaller set sizes as it saves time, but is there a point at all or should I cut the single card reviews and focus on the set as a whole?

Of course I have always loved the feedback I received, even from those with whom I disagreed. I intend to again challenge myself to bring all my knowledge and experience to the table before the prerelease in the hopes of being of some use to you all. The question of format for the review and suggestions of what people want to see is of course the point of this thread, however.

Corrected, formatted, and the riddle put into tags. But next time, if you REALLY have to riddle the card, please use something different than writing in bold letters of several colors. It breaks the rule that all posts should be easily readable.
-Car.

__________________
Wizards could put $100 bills in packs and people would complain about how they were folded.



http://dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated daily, Monday through Thursday!

http://www.sydlexia.com - Pop Culture Ate My Brain!

Last edited by Caranthir : 01-13-2009 at 11:06 AM.
Dr. Jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:27 AM   #2
Yak
Ascended Mage
 
Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 253
Default

Number a: that is really annoying to read.
Number b: I think you could pick a few categories that people would be interested in. Off the top of my head:

Chase rares
Sleeper rares
Bomb limited rares
First pick uncommons
Chase uncommons
Combo fodder
High pick limited commons

and maybe a few more.

EDit: get's it. Starts working it out.
__________________

Thanks to spiderboy4 for the sig.

Quote:
Originally Posted by makingnotches
You sir are amazing. You have the patience of a God.
Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:28 AM   #3
Johm000
2010: The Year of the Island. Thanks Jace!
Moderator
Best Standard Strategist 2009
 
Johm000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Right in the middle of nowhere...
Posts: 4,014
Blog Entries: 5

Portugal

Send a message via AIM to Johm000 Send a message via MSN to Johm000 Send a message via Yahoo to Johm000
Default

Please, for the love of god, tell me that's not a riddle.

Because if it is, it looks frustrating.
__________________








Thanks to spiderboy4 from High~Light Studios
Johm000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:31 AM   #4
lostandthedamned
Archmage
 
lostandthedamned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 841

United Kingdom

Default

taking just the black letters for the first line gives:
Quote:
a card thats no laughing matter
decoding the rest now..
__________________

When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true.
Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no matter what you wish for.
Unless it's death by meteorite.
lostandthedamned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:32 AM   #5
Yak
Ascended Mage
 
Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 253
Default

" A card that's no laughing matter.

Auras abound

Common of course

Single shot grave pact

Costed like terror"

Aura's abound
1B

Target player sacrfices a creature?
__________________

Thanks to spiderboy4 for the sig.

Quote:
Originally Posted by makingnotches
You sir are amazing. You have the patience of a God.
Yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:33 AM   #6
makingnotches
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,470
Blog Entries: 2

United States

Send a message via AIM to makingnotches
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yak View Post
" A card that's not laughing matter.

Auras abound

Common of course

Single shot grave pact

Costed like terror"


You sir are amazing. You have the patience of a God.

EDIT: How did you get that?
__________________
Founder of The [Soundtrack] | My Trades | My Sales |

Thanks to spiderboy4 of High~Light Studios for the awesome banner and avatar!

makingnotches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:34 AM   #7
Blue_Black_Spain
Common Mage
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johm000 View Post
Please, for the love of god, tell me that's not a riddle.

Because if it is, it looks frustrating.
Given that the last phrase is not coloured, while the rest of text is, seems to point this out. But I'm not going through that Vietnam!
Blue_Black_Spain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:34 AM   #8
Chewie8
Just Getting Started
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 12
Default

One sided Innocent Blood?

Multiplayer Cruel Edict?
Chewie8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:34 AM   #9
mrrebel
Experienced Mage
 
mrrebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 120
Default

OMG.....it is a riddle.

AH MY BRAIN!

Not even trying to solve the puzzle and making a post only to say this? Spam infraction.

Last edited by Caranthir : 01-13-2009 at 11:16 AM.
mrrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:35 AM   #10
Blutsau
Ruin Sage of the MUC
Moderator
 
Blutsau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,285

Switzerland

Send a message via MSN to Blutsau
Default

name 1b
Enchantment - Aura
Enchant creature
when enchanted creature is put into a graveyard each opponent sacs a creature.
__________________
Each reality is but the dream of another, and each sleeper a god unknowing.
We define the boundaries of reality; they don't define us.
Blutsau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:35 AM   #11
Axelrod
Go Heels!-even though we really suck 13-10
 
Axelrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,098

United States

Default

Man, I was getting it. Seems like a decent card.

Also, I like your set reviews, Jebus.
Axelrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:38 AM   #12
ElricJC
Comes into play drunk
 
ElricJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,563

United States

Send a message via Yahoo to ElricJC
Default

I will concur on one point - dude, that text, please alter it, it hurts me poor eyes .

As for the reviews themselves, you put a lot of thought and effort into it, which is much appreciated first of all, but one thing I would like to see might be more format based than anything else.

For example, all cards are (hopefully) useful in one form or another, and when categorizing their use in each I would keep in mind the following categories:

Competitive/Format: (Standard, Extended, Legacy, etc)
Limited:
Casual/Format: (like EDH, Prismatic, etc)

At a glance then you could see the ratings, say 1-10 in each group, and get a quick impression of where it might fit in. So if you see a card with a rating no higher than 3 in any category, you get a quick impression that it really sucks.

Also, the tone of the reviews should in general avoid referring to things as "Casual fodder" because in my mind this implies a natural inferiority of Casual to other formats. Emphasis should be placed on the card's positive aspects when possible, while acknowledging that it may have no real usability in more Competitive formats.

But I will also agree that maybe at the end you might have a list of expected Chase Rares, Sleeper Rares, and Over-Hyped Rares, along with useful commons/uncommons.

EDIT: Damn, at the time I wrote this there was only one other post. Bloody people are quick . It was a riddle, figures. And yes, Yak, you are one patient bastard .

Last edited by ElricJC : 01-13-2009 at 10:41 AM.
ElricJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:39 AM   #13
Dr. Jeebus
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blutsau View Post
name 1b
Enchantment - Aura
Enchant creature
when enchanted creature is put into a graveyard each opponent sacs a creature.
Getting there, but things are a little backwards.
__________________
Wizards could put $100 bills in packs and people would complain about how they were folded.



http://dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com - Updated daily, Monday through Thursday!

http://www.sydlexia.com - Pop Culture Ate My Brain!
Dr. Jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:40 AM   #14
Daiches
Common Mage
 
Daiches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dendermonde, Belgium
Posts: 37

Belgium

Default

a card that's no laughIng matter

Auras abound

Common ofcourse

Single shot gravepact

costed like terror

is the riddle (all the black letters..)

So we've got:
No Laughing Matter 1B
Enchantment - Aura
Whenever enchanted creature is put into graveyard from play, each other player sacrifices a creature

Last edited by Daiches : 01-13-2009 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Hmm.. Sarnath'd
Daiches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:41 AM   #15
Nis
01000011 01001111 01010000
 
Nis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In a band with Benalish Hero and Mesa Pegasus
Posts: 1,352
Blog Entries: 8

United States

Default

NAME 1b
Enchantment - Aura
Enchant creature
Whenever another creature is put into a graveyard from play, enchanted creature's controller sacrifices it.
__________________
"This is great - we're like slave buddies!"
Nis is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
User Name:


Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:01 AM.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2005, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.