[ARB] Naya Sojourners and Sanctum Plowbeast

[bjbrains]

Naya Sojourners
Creature- Elf Shaman
2
5/3
When you cycle Naya Sojourners or it is put into a graveyard from play, put a +1/+1 counter on target creature
Cycling: 2

Sanctum Plowbeast
4
Artifact Creature- Beast
3/6
Defender
Plainscycling , Islandcycling

From Wizard's Youtube channel.

[scarlet_blade12]

The Cycle Add-on is pretty decent.

Also, That is one awesome looking cow!

[Zinger314]

First, the Plowbeasts were Yoked. Then, they were Vagrant. Now, they are Sanctum?

Lame.

These cards are overcosted even in limited. Just cycling-enablers.

[Seth Dracovitch]

Plowbeat being yet another cycler, but I really like the art for it.

Sojourners is neat, I'll give it that. Three mana to draw a card and pump a creature

[Atobe]

Nice cards for limited. With all these cycling cards they might as well do a multicolor version of Lightning Rift or Astral Slide. Really like the first one for limited, decent size for its cost but it's the cycling battlegrowth that makes it cool.

[Holameamigo991]

5/3 for 5 that boosts things whenever it leaves play OR is cycled for 3? Hmm....I like it. Not constructed, but should be quite silly for Casual and Limited. THe plowbeast is cool, too, but why is a 3/6 for 5 slapped with Defender?

[KPDaly16]

Originally Posted by Zinger314

First, the Plowbeasts were Yoked. Then, they were Vagrant. Now, they are Sanctum?

Lame.

These cards are overcosted even in limited. Just cycling-enablers.

Everything with cycling is overcosted. It's a side effect of the mechanic.

[MajinNecro69]

I like how the guy even said there were FOUR other Sojourners in a cycle, so he inadvertently spoiled the existence of the other shards' sojourners

[MTGN00B]

+1/+1 counter, replacement card, can't be countered!? Sign me up! (In limited).

[Ranma]

Never underestimate cyclers in limited. That all these were made for afterall.

[ShadowFenril]

I like the Naya Sojourners added bonus for cycling OR dying. That's a nice, unexpected twist. I might just have to run a few of these in my 5 power deck that I'll be making. Not a fan of the other, but hey, what do you really expect for a card with two types of land cycling? It's still has it's uses, and that's fine.

So far, I haven't seen any blatantly terrible cards from this set..

[Shadowmancer711]

Still wanna see the Bant cycle the most. I can predict the rest honestly, but that one is a wild card for me.

[KPDaly16]

Originally Posted by MajinNecro69

I like how the guy even said there were FOUR other Sojourners in a cycle, so he inadvertently spoiled the existence of the other shards' sojourners

So, we have:

Bant Sojourners

Creature - Human Knight
When you cycle Bant Sojourners or it is put into a graveyard from play, put 2 1/1 Soldier tokens into play.
Cycling
?/?

[Zinger314]

Also, Naya Sojorner's marks the first occurrence of the contraction "it's" in a card. In a grammatically incorrect fashion too.

[KPDaly16]

Originally Posted by Zinger314

Also, Naya Sojorner's marks the first occurrence of the contraction "it's" in a card. In a grammatically incorrect fashion too.

How is it grammatically incorrect? It's fine the way it is.

EDIT: If you're referring to the fact that "Sojourners" is plural, keep in mind that any mention of a card's name in the text box is the same as it saying "this card". So the text is using "Naya Sojourners" as a singular reference to the card, not a plural reference to the elves themselves.