![]() |
|
| Home Articles Magic 2011 Spoiler (249/249) Radar Forums Blogs Wiki Writing/Contests Chat About | |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Common Mage
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In your dreams...
Posts: 1
|
-
Last edited by GvL Spoiler : 02-07-2010 at 01:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Wizard Mentor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 569
![]() |
It looks like a red instant/sorcery. notice the lack of creature type.
Urza's rage? that looks like a kicker cost right there. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Experienced Mage
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 76
![]() |
Urza's rage maybe??? Nice cards to start with!
__________________
His bolas whirl like galaxies, but it's his enemies who see stars. (Whipcorder) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Just Getting Started
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 18
|
Awesome! the first gut-feeling about the Negator was right then. Now we have to wait for some statement from Wizards about a change in the Reserved-List ?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goooooooooooooooooooooooo ooal!!!!!
|
it looks like the red one has Kicker. so yeah, i'm going with Urza's Rage.
__________________
Sig as done by Starkiller2 ![]() MTG Rules Advisor Carpe Diem! "So Dark The Con of Man" The revolution of TCG. Fight Klub Just tell 'em Teccan9nja sent ya. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
THE ZIB ZAB AND THE BABBIDY BIBBIDY
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Devil In Jersey City Classification: Pervert
Posts: 5,864
![]() |
I thought Negator was on the reserve list... Hmmm...
But yeah, it looks exactly like Negator's text.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Premium MTGSalvation member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manasjap madness
Posts: 4,815
|
The other is definitely urza's rage. The text is about right in length when compared to the old card
__________________
Banner by Quote:
Funky Stuff:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Textbased Lifeform
MTGS Writer ![]() |
Red instant or sorcery with Urza in the artwork and mana symbols in the text. Most definitely Urza's Rage.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Archmage
|
that's DEFINATELY negator, and that's DEFINATELY urzas rage.
__________________
Drifting through the thoughts of nothing, standing in the tide of gore, My mind may wander away from structure, but it seems to want it more and more, and as we drift in place, we lose the race, and distance past seems score by four. DakotahWalsh.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Scion of Fire
Moderator ![]() |
Indeed. Negator and Urza's Rage. One can even make the words "dealt damage" and "that many permanents".
Rage was quite obvious from the first moment, the Negator was also the prime suspect. But why there is a reserved list card? Good to have the confirmation. Last edited by Caranthir : 02-04-2010 at 05:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Textbased Lifeform
MTGS Writer ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,714
![]() |
It's perfectly legible for me, just zooming in a little bit.
Defiantly Phyrexian Negator (you can even read the name in the text box) and Urza's Rage (a bit harder to read the name, but you can read "rage" and there's the unmistakable kicker cost anyway). |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Experienced Mage
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 114
|
Negator's on the Reserve List, but that means that they can still reprint it with a different foiling AND artwork. From the Reprint Policy:
Quote:
If the NEgators' the Foil, then the policy doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Textbased Lifeform
MTGS Writer ![]() |
I don't think that applies here as this Negator (and the Judge Promo Negator for that matter) are both tournament-legal cards. They are meant for regular gameplay as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Archmage Overlord
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,714
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|