I'm not seeing this card spoiled anywhere in the forum, I hope I'm not wrong posting this thread. Mod please delete this if duplicated
Taken from an Italian website who isn't giving any reference, so take it with a grain of salt:
Liliana, Queen of Darkness
2BB
+2 Each player discards a card
-1 Return target creature card from your graveyard to the battlefield
-6 You gain 1 life for each card in your graveyard, target opponent loses 1 life for each card in his or her graveyard
3
EDIT: 99,9% fake after reading the first messages, mod please lock/delete this thread. :\
As a design not bad, just not really what I'm expecting for the name and image. I really expect the known image to be promotional material only by some of its details.
EDIT: The ultimate seems awkwardly templated. Wouldn't the two abilities either be seperate sentences or seperated by something else than a mere comma (e. g. "then" or more unlikely "and")?
I guess it's a fake then.
EDIT2: Misread the second ability as a Raise Dead rather than Zombify. Well, now the balance is out of the window as well...
I am lovin' it. Much flavor and works well i na few decks I already own. This'll be a top notch Liliana... which will, consequently, put the old Liliana to shame.
And yet, another example that pushes the GY theme.
Anyone who thinks this is a bad planeswalker is a true novice.
This doesn't look fake at all! Not only does it have perfectly imbalanced abilities and a mana cost unfitting for those abilities but it also has the worst name I've ever heard given to a planeswalker ever! I mean really.. the -1 ability is insane and giving her +2 for the same ability her former self had only giving her +1 for a 5 mana cost...
The Italian site said also that the image of card was originally inside the article of Doug Beyer and soon removed and replaced with the art of Liliana.
If it would be a fake, it's surely well done.
This is incorrect, as well, because I read the article within seconds that it was posted, and this was nowhere in the article.
If what you claim is true, than the Italian site would have had to have access to the article BEFORE it was posted....
That is a literal incarnation of that post verbatim
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Asking people to remove quotes in their signatures is tyranny! If I can't say something just because someone's feelings are hurt then no one would ever be able to say anything! Political correctness is stupid.
After close examination, this card could be a real fake.
However I'm not on either side of fence here, but the second ability is a bit undercosted for Wizards and the sentence on the last ability is most likely wrong.
I don't buy it. I seriously doubt they'd use this artwork for a card. Plus, the templating is all wrong, as mentioned before.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Onmyouza Theatre, An unofficial international fanclub forum dedicated to the Japanese visual kei heavy metal band Onmyo-Za: http://www.onmyozatheatre.com
Liliana was recently confirmed. But this rings fake with me.
Edit: For partly the same reason secretinfiltrator stated.
I can agree with you, and also the source confirmation is very scarce. But the comma can simply be a shortcut for a very long description of the ultimate ability, I wouldn't give it that much importance.
Nevertheless, I decided to post it here for public discussion just in case it was the real deal.
To the OP, why are you posting such an obvious fake? Maybe take five seconds to actually read the text and note the mistake in it?
And one day after a closed thread about a supposed Liliana planeswalker, some site gets the supposed planeswalker way too early in the rumor season? Even if you couldn't be bothered to search for the post that this card is copied from, just take a couple seconds to think about the timing.
This is just like all those other past instances when we get some snippet about some planeswalker in the upcoming set, and then the VERY NEXT DAY somebody posts a supposed image of that planeswalker. Hint: If the planeswalker image appears THE DAY RIGHT AFTER the community first hears a rumor of it, then this is someone trying to capitalize on the new hype, and the image is fake.
This card is wrong on so many levels. Use some common sense and think before posting such obvious fakes.
That is a literal incarnation of that post verbatim
I third that statement, i was looking at that post yesterday, then saw this card and immediately thought that either the guy was psychologically linked to the design team, or the OP just ninja'd a picture and copy pasta'd the speculated abilties...
Quick, everybody look! I've found the most important confirmed planeswalker from the next set.
No, I don't care. No, I don't believe you for one second. Whenever a new set is coming, someone always trying to fake the planeswalker in it, and it's starting to get old.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Taken from an Italian website who isn't giving any reference, so take it with a grain of salt:
Liliana, Queen of Darkness
2BB
+2 Each player discards a card
-1 Return target creature card from your graveyard to the battlefield
-6 You gain 1 life for each card in your graveyard, target opponent loses 1 life for each card in his or her graveyard
3
EDIT: 99,9% fake after reading the first messages, mod please lock/delete this thread. :\
EDIT: The ultimate seems awkwardly templated. Wouldn't the two abilities either be seperate sentences or seperated by something else than a mere comma (e. g. "then" or more unlikely "and")?
I guess it's a fake then.
EDIT2: Misread the second ability as a Raise Dead rather than Zombify. Well, now the balance is out of the window as well...
Finally a good white villain quote: "So, do I ever re-evaluate my life choices? Never, because I know what I'm doing is a righteous cause."
Factions: Sleeping
Remnants: Valheim
Legendary Journey: Heroes & Planeswalkers
Saga: Shards of Rabiah
Legends: The Elder Dragons
Read up on Red Flags & NWO
Edit: For partly the same reason secretinfiltrator stated.
And yet, another example that pushes the GY theme.
Anyone who thinks this is a bad planeswalker is a true novice.
If you zoom in on the image file of it, there's a blurring box that surrounds all the text.
Bad photoshopping.
rule 1?
This is incorrect, as well, because I read the article within seconds that it was posted, and this was nowhere in the article.
If what you claim is true, than the Italian site would have had to have access to the article BEFORE it was posted....
That is a literal incarnation of that post verbatim
EDIT: Freaking same time, same content posts.
....lol
Slowpoke: "Have you guy's heard"
After close examination, this card could be a real fake.
However I'm not on either side of fence here, but the second ability is a bit undercosted for Wizards and the sentence on the last ability is most likely wrong.
http://www.onmyozatheatre.com
BelzDecks: Check out my current decks !
BelzCards: Look at all the neat cards I made up !
I can agree with you, and also the source confirmation is very scarce. But the comma can simply be a shortcut for a very long description of the ultimate ability, I wouldn't give it that much importance.
Nevertheless, I decided to post it here for public discussion just in case it was the real deal.
And one day after a closed thread about a supposed Liliana planeswalker, some site gets the supposed planeswalker way too early in the rumor season? Even if you couldn't be bothered to search for the post that this card is copied from, just take a couple seconds to think about the timing.
This is just like all those other past instances when we get some snippet about some planeswalker in the upcoming set, and then the VERY NEXT DAY somebody posts a supposed image of that planeswalker. Hint: If the planeswalker image appears THE DAY RIGHT AFTER the community first hears a rumor of it, then this is someone trying to capitalize on the new hype, and the image is fake.
This card is wrong on so many levels. Use some common sense and think before posting such obvious fakes.
I third that statement, i was looking at that post yesterday, then saw this card and immediately thought that either the guy was psychologically linked to the design team, or the OP just ninja'd a picture and copy pasta'd the speculated abilties...
Modern:R 8Whack R|W White Knights W
You can find me on MTGO. My username is gereffi.
No, I don't care. No, I don't believe you for one second. Whenever a new set is coming, someone always trying to fake the planeswalker in it, and it's starting to get old.